Ultimate truth can be reached from the relation between existence and nihility. Simply speaking,
This is an objective truth standard. Larger system won more attention, respect and even worship from human beings. You can imagine, if there were a system larger than universe, its laws will be worshiped better than "natural laws", and treated as more important truth than natural laws. With the objective truth standard, the system with the largest possibility to be observed contains ultimate truth.
Since human beings themselves also want to increase their happiness, "large" also becomes their subjective standards to evaluate truth. If, in a long time, development of a country is decided by its methodology, then, more developed countries contain more social truths.
The following questions are related with each other:
Why does matter exist?
How did universe origin?
Why all observable important systems are growing larger and larger?
Why do present basic natural laws exist, not other possible laws?
Suppose there is nihility and a perturbation d . When the perturbation is a group of quantities that can not increase the perturbation, nihility is at indifferent equilibrium for this kind of perturbations. If the perturbation reduces by itself, nihility is stable for this kind of perturbations.
If d is a group of quantities which forms a tiny ˇ°developableˇ± system, like d (universe) and d (economy), the perturbation will grow with time, so nihility is unstable for this kind of perturbations. The existence of such perturbations is guaranteed by Axioms and Theorems about a Perfect Pursuit System": universe is a close expanding system.
More generally, if there is perturbation freedom, any imperfect existence, existence that can not expand the fastest, is unstable. The perfect perturbation will have much larger scale than the existence after enough long evolution.
In "Truth Evolutionism", stability means observation probability. So, unstable means that the probability to observe existences that expanding slowly reduces with time. When there is a perturbation that can self-expanding the fastest, then the probability to observe the perturbation increases with time. After enough long evolution, the observation probability is nearly 100%.
Whether to treat existences as inanimate particles or animate pursuers does not make any differences. The key is self-expanding, no matter by instinct or by intellectual chosen. If self-expanding systems are called pursuit systems, then science of pursuit, which mainly studying self-expanding systems, is part of "Truth Evolutionism". Inanimate systems are pursuit systems with zero "desire" and can not expand, their observation probability resuces with evolution, so the world is almost 100% dominated by pursuit systems.
In human language, "inorganic" or "inanimate" just means the substance does not pursue the same as cells do. In science of pursuit, "inanimate" ought to mean that the substance does not pursue any quantity the best.
From "Truth Evolutionism", if an evil system can be isolated, it does not need to be punished. The bad methodology itself will execute the punishment. In society, it means isolation is a better and fair way to punish crime(if isolation is possible).
For all kinds of perturbations, the one expanding the fastest will have the largest observation probability, corresponding to universe. In science of pursuit, the fastest growing system is called in any special situation. Similarly in economy and research, for any bad situation caused by internal pursuers' behaviors, there is one way at least, like adjusting interest rate, to prevent them from depressing forever.
In economics and mathematics, scientists have not found a complete mechanism about development, let alone to describe development in a close system.